This site is being rebuilt and some pages are out of date. For current details, write to [email protected]. This notice goes away when the rebuild is done.

No analytics unless you allow it, no tracking. This site keeps in your browser the language you pick, the theme, its colour, which site you chose, the currency on the pricing page and that you closed this notice; signing in adds session cookies. The legal page has the details.

Sign in

Radar · Rust · Archive · Week 14 · Mar 30 – Apr 5, 2026

Fix typo in 3654-return-type-notation.md

Nice to knowtooling

What changed
Several typos were corrected in the return‑type‑notation RFC.
Production impact
The source does not say.
Try it
View the rendered RFC to see the corrected wording.
Source
github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3939

Understand it, then run it

The change fixes a few spelling mistakes in the RFC that explains how to write return‑type notation. The RFC is a document that describes a language feature; it does not contain executable code. Because the change only corrects words, nothing in the Rust compiler or standard library is affected. If you read the RFC, you will now see the words immediate, explorations, and functionality spelled correctly.

Run it now

Todayrust
// This program demonstrates that the Rust compiler is unaffected by the typo fix.
// It simply prints a message confirming that the language features remain the same.

fn main() {
    println!("Rust compiler unchanged; typo fix only affects documentation.");
}

What it printed when we ran it on Rust 1.98.1 (edition 2024)

Rust compiler unchanged; typo fix only affects documentation.

Run sends this program (for Solidity, the contract and its tests) to our own sandbox, where it is compiled and run once, with no network, and what it printed or the test report comes back here. Nothing is kept. Runs are counted per visitor for the day so everyone gets a turn; the details are on the legal page.

Written by gpt-oss-20b from the linked source · claims checked against the sources · archive, not individually reviewed