This site is being rebuilt and some pages are out of date. For current details, write to [email protected]. This notice goes away when the rebuild is done.

No analytics unless you allow it, no tracking. This site keeps in your browser the language you pick, the theme, its colour, which site you chose, the currency on the pricing page and that you closed this notice; signing in adds session cookies. The legal page has the details.

Sign in

Radar · Go · Archive · Week 4 · Jan 19 – 25, 2026

Results from the 2025 Go Developer Survey

Nice to knowecosystem

What changed
The blog post reports the 2025 Go Developer Survey results, focusing on developer sentiment towards Go, use cases, challenges, and developer environments.
Production impact
The source does not say.
Try it
Read the blog post to see how Go is being used and what challenges developers face.
Source
go.dev/blog/survey2025

Understand it, then run it

Run it now

Todaygo
package main

import "fmt"

func main() {
	// The 2025 Go Developer Survey was conducted in September 2025.
	// This program simply prints a summary of the survey results.
	fmt.Println("2025 Go Developer Survey Summary:")
	fmt.Println("- 5,379 developers responded.")
	fmt.Println("- 91% are satisfied with Go.")
	fmt.Println("- Main use cases: CLIs and API services.")
	fmt.Println("- Top challenges: idiomatic Go practices, missing features, module trust.")
}

What it printed when we ran it on Go 1.27.1

2025 Go Developer Survey Summary:
- 5,379 developers responded.
- 91% are satisfied with Go.
- Main use cases: CLIs and API services.
- Top challenges: idiomatic Go practices, missing features, module trust.

Run sends this program (for Solidity, the contract and its tests) to our own sandbox, where it is compiled and run once, with no network, and what it printed or the test report comes back here. Nothing is kept. Runs are counted per visitor for the day so everyone gets a turn; the details are on the legal page.

Written by gpt-oss-20b from the linked source · claims checked against the sources · archive, not individually reviewed