This site is being rebuilt and some pages are out of date. For current details, write to [email protected]. This notice goes away when the rebuild is done.

No analytics unless you allow it, no tracking. This site keeps in your browser the language you pick, the theme, its colour, which site you chose, the currency on the pricing page and that you closed this notice; signing in adds session cookies. The legal page has the details.

Sign in

Radar · Rust · Archive · Week 8 · Feb 17 – 23, 2025

2024 State of Rust Survey Results

Nice to knowecosystem

What changed
The Rust team published the results of the 2024 State of Rust Survey.
Production impact
The source does not say.
Try it
Browse the survey results to gauge community sentiment.
Source
blog.rust-lang.org/2025/02/13/2024-State-Of-Rust-Survey-results.html

Understand it, then run it

The Rust team released the results of the 2024 State of Rust Survey. The survey is a yearly community poll that asks Rust users about their experience, tools, and ecosystem. The published results give a snapshot of how Rust is being used and what people like or find challenging. This change is informational; it does not affect how you write Rust code.

Run it now

Todayrust
// This program demonstrates that the 2024 State of Rust Survey results
// are a community announcement and do not affect Rust code.
// It simply prints a message acknowledging the release.

fn main() {
    println!("The 2024 State of Rust Survey results have been published.");
}

What it printed when we ran it on Rust 1.98.1 (edition 2024)

The 2024 State of Rust Survey results have been published.

Run sends this program (for Solidity, the contract and its tests) to our own sandbox, where it is compiled and run once, with no network, and what it printed or the test report comes back here. Nothing is kept. Runs are counted per visitor for the day so everyone gets a turn; the details are on the legal page.

Written by gpt-oss-20b from the linked source · claims checked against the sources · archive, not individually reviewed